The Fraud Triangle

Published:

Criminologist Donald R. Cressey interviewed 200 incarcerated embezzlers and studied the characteristics and factors influencing their criminal behaviour in the 1940's and introduced the theory of the Fraud Triangle in the 1950's.


The fraud triangle suggests that there are three factors that contribute to a person committing fraud.

Most people are fair and honest, but what was found in this study is that even people with very high ethical standards can become tempted to commit a crime and actually execute the crime in particular when the three factors from the fraud triangle are present.


Pressure

Pressure can come from many directions and can be a driver that pushes someone to commit fraud:

  • Desire for better remuneration or promotion
  • Unrealistic goals and targets
  • Personal financial problems
  • Adverse relationships within the firm and with management
  • Fear of losing position
  • Fear of delivering bad news, hiding truth
  • Greed


Cuando se investiga un caso de fraude, es necesario comprender y explorar cualquier factor de presiĆ³n para los sospechosos, ya que estos pueden ofrecer un motivo para actos ilegales.

Opportunity


Opportunity is the chance, occasion, knowledge or possibility someone has to commit fraud. Some circumstances that will influence those opportunities are:

  • Absent or ineffective controls
  • Lack of supervision
  • Inadequate segregation of duties


Rationalisation


Rationalisation is about the excuses fraudsters give themselves to justify their acts. This factor is more difficult to observe or understand when performing an investigation and may require several interviews. Some rationalizations I've heard in my career:

  • It is just temporary, I will pay it back
  • Nobody will feel it or will be hurt
  • Everybody is doing it
  • I deserve this